• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / Tax Controversy / Would Uncle Sam consider chickens the same as cash?
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

Would Uncle Sam consider chickens the same as cash?

There is a great deal of uncertainty tied to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). One involves the treatment of chickens. Puns abound when analyzing how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will define chickens without running afoul of the new tax law. But all jokes aside, the issue is a serious one for those in the poultry market.

The question centers on whether a live chicken would count as cash if a liquid market exists. Why would it matter? If considered a cash equivalent, a different tax rate would apply.

The TCJA led to the creation of two different tax rates. The IRS taxes cash and cash equivalents at 15.5 percent. The agency taxes non-cash assets at 8 percent. The language of the law defines “cash” as:

(i) “cash held by such foreign corporation,

(ii) the net accounts receivable of such foreign corporation, plus

(iii) the fair market value of the following assets held by such corporation:

I) Personal property which is of a type that is actively traded for which there is an established financial market.

II)  Commercial paper, certificates of deposit, the securities of the Federal government and of any State or foreign government.

III) Any foreign currency.

IV) Any obligation with a term of less than one year.

V)   Any asset which the Secretary identifies as being economically equivalent to any asset described in this subparagraph.”

Will the agency treat the chicken as a non-cash asset and apply the lower tax rate, or will it consider the chicken a cash asset and apply the higher rate? The United States Treasury will need to provide additional regulations before a definitive answer is available.

Chickens are only the beginning. Tax payers will need to analyze various assets to determine which rate will apply. An attorney experienced in these matters can help to better ensure your tax filings follow applicable tax law. 

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Jun 14 2018 Tax Controversy

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

5 Things to Do if You Get Audited in Minnesota

March 27, 2023

What is a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty?

January 31, 2023

A Guide to the Minnesota Tax Appeal Process

January 27, 2023

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

4951 W 77th Street, Box 11
Edina, MN 55435

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 612-682-4711

Roseville Tax Law Office:

1915 Hwy 36 West, Box 3
Roseville, MN 55113

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2025 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy