• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / Audits / Economists worry that Minnesota tax plan might be unsustainable
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

Economists worry that Minnesota tax plan might be unsustainable

More legislative changes are underway in Minnesota after Governor Mark Dayton signs another bill into law. The first this month was the history-making passing of same-sex marriage, which invariably requires a tax conversation over changes that might need to be made. 

Another major change was recently added to the Minnesota tax world that has a more direct change. That was the agreement between legislators and Gov. Dayton that a 2 percent tax would be levied against residents who met a certain income level. This most recent change has economists discussing and debating the future of Minnesota’s tax structure. 

The 2 percent tax increase applies to married individuals who earn over $250,000 per year and individuals who earn $150,000 or more. This means that couples at the threshold would pay in approximatley $5,000 more per month. Lawmakers hoped that this new measure would help Minnesota close the gap on funding necessary for such things as increased educational expenses while only affecting a small percentage of residents. 

Some economists have weighed in with their opinions about whether the plan is sustainable into the future. Like any other measure, some support the increase and some don’t. There is even a small subset that supports it in the short-term but fears the effect it will have in the longrun. 

Economist David Vang is one of this latter group. He said that relying on the tax increase for this small percentage leaves the state vulnerable. He warned that those under the new tax burden will not only look for new ways to shelter income but may even move out of state. 

Maximizing tax benefits is certainly a goal for many, but the more creative the plan, the more susceptible the taxpayer becomes to a tax audit. For those facing an audit, it is important that they seek the assistance of a tax professional.

Source: My Fox Twin Cities, “MN TAX HIKE: What are the implications?” Jonathan Choe, May 19, 2013

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC May 21 2013 Audits

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

The Importance of Source Documents

July 7, 2022

What Is a Notice of Deficiency?

June 9, 2022

What is the IRS dispute resolution process for businesses?

April 9, 2021

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 420
Edina, MN 55439

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 952-835-0201

St. Anthony Tax Law Office:

2812 Anthony Lane S, Suite 200
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2023 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy