• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / Tax Controversy / Can the IRS go after a business to satisfy a personal liability?
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

Can the IRS go after a business to satisfy a personal liability?

There are a lot of taxpayers in Minneapolis that have ties to a business, whether it is a somewhat detached investment interest or a hands-on management role. Can these businesses be reached to satisfy a personal tax liability? The answer, like so many others is “it depends.”

Much of the argument rests around not only how a company is structured, but how close the individual’s ties are to that company. Is there management control? What was the ownership interest? How much access does the taxpayer have to the company’s assets? These are all questions that matter in the determination. Take Dionne Warwick’s current situation as an example.

Warwick recently found herself in need of bankruptcy protection, and during the process, this exact “ownership” issue presented itself when the IRS sought satisfaction of Warwick’s personal tax debt instead of allowing the bankruptcy court to discharge the $7 million liability. 

In Warwick’s case, the IRS argued that the $7 million debt could be satisfied by two companies with which Warwick had ties to. These ties, the IRS said were so close that the companies could be considered the singer’s “alter egos.” 

Warwick presented a very different picture. First off, the IRS never mentioned these companies in an initial motion over the tax liability. Further than that, Warwick was paid a salary by the companies but did not have an ownership interest nor did she act as a director with management power. This, her representative said was an attempt to “collect on prepetition levies against the debtor from property in which the debtor has no interest.”

What will the court rule? We cannot say in this case. However, this situation presents the type of argument that is often made when tax liability is involved whether in bankruptcy or not. Whether a business or an individual taxpayer, when tax liability arises in this type of situation there is no doubt that a consultation with a Minneapolis tax attorney is a must. 

Source: The Wall Street Journal, “Dionne Warwick Takes on the IRS,” Jacqueline Palank, June 10, 2013

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Jun 11 2013 Tax Controversy

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

5 Things to Do if You Get Audited in Minnesota

March 27, 2023

What is a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty?

January 31, 2023

A Guide to the Minnesota Tax Appeal Process

January 27, 2023

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

4951 W 77th Street, Box 11
Edina, MN 55435

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 612-682-4711

Roseville Tax Law Office:

1915 Hwy 36 West, Box 3
Roseville, MN 55113

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2025 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy