• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / Audits / Looking at tax fraud vs. tax negligence, and some factors that impact penalties, P.1
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

Looking at tax fraud vs. tax negligence, and some factors that impact penalties, P.1

When significant discrepancies are noticed in a tax return, the Internal Revenue Service will take notice and reserves the right to conduct an audit to determine the reason for noncompliance. In the audit process, the IRS is particularly concerned about determining whether noncompliance is due to negligence or fraud.

The question of whether noncompliance can be characterized as fraud or negligence is an important one from the standpoint of penalties. Taxpayers who made a mistake on a tax return are not punished as severely as taxpayers who attempt to defraud the IRS. The general difference between fraud and negligence, of course, is that tax fraud is intentional noncompliance, whereas negligence is unintentional noncompliance.

While each case is unique, there are certain patterns tax authorities look for to determine whether they are dealing with fraud or negligence. 

In looking out for fraud, tax authorities tend to look for things like: false explanations for understatements or omissions in income; concealing the sources of income; numerous errors in favor of the taxpayer; false records; verbal misrepresentations of facts and circumstances; and failure to provide records. Investigators generally do not consider only one of these factors to form a definitive case of fraud.

Negligence is different in that tax authorities are looking for signs that a taxpayer did not have the specific intent to skirt tax laws. Authorities will look for signs that the taxpayer disregarded rules or regulations rather than engaged in intentional violations. Some of the indicators authorities look out for include: a history of noncompliance; sloppy record-keeping; failure to establish internal processes for reporting business transactions; under-reporting or understating income and failure to offer a reasonable explanation; and utilizing generic deduction descriptions in order to hide the true nature of a deduction.

In our next post, we’ll consider the importance of working with an experienced attorney during the audit process. 

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Jan 29 2016 Audits

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

The Importance of Source Documents

July 7, 2022

What Is a Notice of Deficiency?

June 9, 2022

What is the IRS dispute resolution process for businesses?

April 9, 2021

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 420
Edina, MN 55439

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 952-835-0201

St. Anthony Tax Law Office:

2812 Anthony Lane S, Suite 200
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2023 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy