• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / Tax Controversy / I’m a ‘responsible person.’ What might that mean re: Taxes?
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

I’m a ‘responsible person.’ What might that mean re: Taxes?

Being a responsible person is a good thing. Of course, there are two sides to every coin and the same applies when using this term. In terms of the IRS, carrying the responsible person label in a role associated with a Minnesota business can mean significant headaches for you in the event of a dispute over taxes.

That can happen even when your motivations are pure. The issue that the IRS is very likely to focus on is whether your actions represented a willful disregard in meeting an outstanding tax obligation. And if circumstances are right, the courts may well stand with the IRS, as a Texas doctor learned recently.

What a responsible person is in terms of a business is one who has signatory authority over company funds. In this particular case, the doctor acknowledged he was such a party. The business was the medical practice he had started. However, he also had hired a chief financial officer. That person took care of payroll. He had also embezzled funds and failed to pay staff payroll taxes. The CFO eventually pleaded guilty to the theft.

According to court records, the doctor learned on May 11, 2009, that a tax bill in excess of $10 million existed. However, on May 15 of that year, the doctor lent the practice $100,000 of his own money to meet payroll then due. The IRS proceeded to penalize the doctor more than $4 million. It argued that as a responsible person, the doctor should have put that money toward the taxes owed. By not doing so, he acted willfully.

The IRS and a federal appeals court both ruled against the doctor in his efforts to get out from under the tax obligation. He is now appealing those decisions arguing that his action was reasonable and not willful. He hopes to have the court shift the obligation to the former CFO.

What this all points to is that if you have responsible person status within a business, you need to understand what your obligations are and the liabilities you could incur due to the actions of others. If controversies arise, speak with an experienced attorney.

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Apr 04 2017 Tax Controversy

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

5 Things to Do if You Get Audited in Minnesota

March 27, 2023

What is a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty?

January 31, 2023

A Guide to the Minnesota Tax Appeal Process

January 27, 2023

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

4951 W 77th Street, Box 11
Edina, MN 55435

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 612-682-4711

Roseville Tax Law Office:

1915 Hwy 36 West, Box 3
Roseville, MN 55113

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2025 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy