• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / Tax Litigation / RESPECT Act requires criminal charges before IRS forfeiture
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

RESPECT Act requires criminal charges before IRS forfeiture

Business owners in Minnesota may find relief in knowing that the new Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act prohibits the IRS from seizing property without first filing criminal charges. After the IRS accused two small business owners of structuring cash transactions as a means to hide illicit activity, Congress passed the Act to prevent cash-reliant businesses from unconstitutional forfeiture.

According to Forbes magazine, the IRS seized approximately $200 million from 2,100 taxpayers allegedly involved in criminal activity. Between 2005 and 2012, the IRS cited civil forfeiture to confiscate property it alleged was part of a criminal enterprise. Nearly half of the cash amounts confiscated, however, were worth less than $34,000, which is not a general characteristic of criminal activity.


Small cash deposits resulted in an unconstitutional seizure

The Bank Secrecy Act passed in 1970 requires banks and financial institutions to report cash transactions of $10,000 or more. If an employee of a financial institution suspects a business is engaging in any criminal activity, he or she must file a suspicious activity report with the U.S. Treasury. When a business deposits small cash amounts under $10,000 frequently, the transactions may trigger a report if it appears there is an intent to hide illicit activity.

Although it is not common, false suspicions may arise when legitimate cash-heavy business owners make small and frequent cash deposits. Because of reports of such suspicious activity, the IRS seized bank accounts of legitimate small business owners. Law enforcement officials did not charge owners with a crime, but the IRS, in some cases, confiscated cash and property it suspected were illegal gains based on the financial institution’s reports.


Businesses may challenge a civil forfeiture

Under the RESPECT Act, the IRS may seize property and assets only when it is “derived from an illegal source.” The agency may attempt to confiscate cash deposits it suspects were intentionally structured to conceal illicit activity, but business owners may challenge the IRS in court.

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Dec 05 2019 Tax Litigation

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

5 Things to Do if You Get Audited in Minnesota

March 27, 2023

What is a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty?

January 31, 2023

A Guide to the Minnesota Tax Appeal Process

January 27, 2023

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

4951 W 77th Street, Box 11
Edina, MN 55435

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 612-682-4711

Roseville Tax Law Office:

1915 Hwy 36 West, Box 3
Roseville, MN 55113

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2025 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy