• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / IRS / Does the IRS require records for Bitcoin transactions?
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

Does the IRS require records for Bitcoin transactions?

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is particular about paperwork. This holds true when it comes to transactions involving cryptocurrency like Bitcoins.

Why would I need to keep a record of these transactions? The IRS requires that any earnings made on these transactions be included in tax documents. A piece in Forbes discussed the agency’s requirements by delving into the details of a John Doe summons to Coinbase. The summons requested information about Coinbase users for the previous three years. 

The piece concluded that this was a warning sign for cryptocurrency users: the IRS is watching.

What types of records are needed? It is wise to keep a record of all transactions within this market. Keep record of the date, the number of bitcoins transferred and the gain or loss.

It is important to note that this is a new area of tax law and retroactive rulings are possible. As such, it is wise to retain records for a couple of years to better ensure preparation in case you need to defend yourself against a notice from the IRS.

What if records are not present? A recent piece in Cointelegraph discussed this issue. It discussed the possibility of invoking the Cohan rule. This rule essentially allows the taxpayer to substantiate the costs related to digital currency in a manner other than written records. In the case of Cohan v. Commissioner, the man accused of fraudulently claiming expenses on his taxes was allowed to use testimony to substantiate his filings. The case was not a slam dunk. Unfortunately, it took many rounds for the plaintiff to beat the accusations of the IRS. 

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Dec 26 2017 IRS

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

5 Things to Do if You Get Audited in Minnesota

March 27, 2023

What is a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty?

January 31, 2023

A Guide to the Minnesota Tax Appeal Process

January 27, 2023

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

4951 W 77th Street, Box 11
Edina, MN 55435

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 612-682-4711

Roseville Tax Law Office:

1915 Hwy 36 West, Box 3
Roseville, MN 55113

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2025 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy