• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home / IRS / Do employers have an “affirmative” requirement to pay taxes?
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Review Us
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Tax Law Services
    • CP504 Notice in MN
  • Professional Referrals
  • Our Required Retainer Deposit & Fees
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog

Do employers have an “affirmative” requirement to pay taxes?

The Internal Revenue Code is a large, confusing beast. Employers are subject to a number of requirements when it comes to paying taxes on behalf of their employees. One specific question recently posed in court: are employers required to take “affirmative action” to both account for and pay withheld taxes to the government?

The case involved a medical professional that owned a private practice that allegedly withheld Internal Revenue Service (IRS) payroll taxes but failed to remit the taxes to the government. As a result, the government charged the business owner with ten counts of a failure to remit IRS payroll taxes.

What happened in this case? This case serves as a lesson on the harsh penalties that can come with a conviction for tax crimes. A jury convicted the medical professional on all counts. The court sentenced the business owner to almost three years in prison along with a required $2.9 million restitution payment.

The professional appealed the holding, stating the court erroneously applied the tax code. He argued the section of the law used to result in the conviction required he fail to collect and fail to remit the taxes. He states the court erred when it instructed the jury that he was guilty if he “failed to comply with one of the two duties.”  He argued a violation occurs when both elements are not met. He argued if the court’s interpretation was correct, the law would use the word “or” as opposed to “and.”

Ultimately the appellate court stated the law imposes a mandatory obligation for employers to affirmatively fulfill both elements listed above.

What does this mean for Minnesota business owners? The federal tax code applies to all business owners, regardless of the state of operation. This case shows what can happen if a business owner fails to properly collect and remit payroll tax obligations. Any business owner that is the subject of an investigation or charged with similar crimes is wise to take action to build a defense. An attorney experienced in business tax law matters can help.

On Behalf of Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC Oct 01 2018 IRS

Primary Sidebar

Do Not Delay Responding to a Tax Notice

Name(Required)

Practice Areas

Tax Disputes

  • Tax Litigation
  • Audits
  • Tax Appeals
    • Appealing a Levy Action

Business & Payroll Taxes

  • Trust Fund Assessments
  • Complying with Sales and Use Tax Laws

Self-Employed

  • No Taxes Withheld

Outstanding Balances

  • IRS Collections and Currently Not Collectible Status
  • Settlement Options
    • Offers in Compromise
    • Installment Agreements

Latest Blogs

5 Things to Do if You Get Audited in Minnesota

March 27, 2023

What is a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty?

January 31, 2023

A Guide to the Minnesota Tax Appeal Process

January 27, 2023

The Secret to Successful Self-Employment

October 19, 2022

Things You Should Expect Being Self-Employed in Minnesota

October 13, 2022

Footer

Edina Tax Law Office

4951 W 77th Street, Box 11
Edina, MN 55435

Telephone: 952-835-8320

Fax: 612-682-4711

Roseville Tax Law Office:

1915 Hwy 36 West, Box 3
Roseville, MN 55113

Telephone: 612-455-8948

Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC provides legal counsel for clients in Minnesota and Western Wisconsin

© 2025 Pridgeon & Zoss, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy